51 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
51 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# Site: Open Collective — OSArch
|
|
|
|
**Proposed by:** theoryshaw
|
|
**Date:** 2026-05-11
|
|
**Status:** Active — bootstrapped at genesis; community may remove or amend
|
|
([how site governance works](../../ARCHITECTURE.md#how-should-the-community-decide-which-sites-to-collect-from))
|
|
|
|
**Platform:** [Open Collective](../platforms/opencollective.md)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## What is this site?
|
|
|
|
The OSArch collective at `opencollective.com/osarch` is the primary funding channel for
|
|
the OSArch community. All contributions and expenses are publicly visible — who funded,
|
|
how much, and when.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Inclusion criteria
|
|
|
|
| Criterion | Met? | Notes |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Data is publicly accessible (no API key required) | Yes | All contributions publicly listed |
|
|
| Actively used by a meaningful portion of the community | Yes | Primary funding channel for OSArch |
|
|
| Activity represents genuine effort, not easily gamed | Partial | Financial contribution is real commitment, but money ≠ participation |
|
|
| Platform is stable enough to depend on | Yes | Open Collective is a well-established platform |
|
|
| Relevant to the community's actual work | Yes | Directly funds OSArch operations and projects |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Score weight
|
|
|
|
Current weight in `config.yaml`: `funding_activity: 0.1`
|
|
|
|
Intentionally low — financial contribution is meaningful but should not outweigh
|
|
sustained participation.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Concerns or open questions
|
|
|
|
- See [Funding signals: merged or separate?](../../ARCHITECTURE.md#funding-signals-merged-or-separate)
|
|
- Should recurring funders be weighted differently than one-off contributors?
|
|
- See [Should funding have representation beyond a score weight?](../../ARCHITECTURE.md#should-funding-have-representation-beyond-a-score-weight)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Discussion
|
|
|
|
Not yet opened.
|