Ryan Schultz
2bd59e53c9
- docs/decisions/004-no-per-repo-tier-weighting.md — records why all GitHub repos are weighted equally; prevents the question from being re-litigated from scratch - docs/sites/CHANGE_TEMPLATE.md (renamed from RETIREMENT_TEMPLATE.md) — covers weight adjustments, scope changes, and full retirement in one template - config.yaml — added github.repos list to define collection scope explicitly - docs/sites/active/github.md — reverted to simple repo table; links to ADR 004 - docs/sites/active/README.md — GitHub section notes equal weighting with ADR 004 link - docs/ARCHITECTURE.md — CHANGE_TEMPLATE linked from site governance section - README.md — Contributing section links to both PROPOSAL_TEMPLATE and CHANGE_TEMPLATE Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.2 KiB
Site Change Proposal: [Platform Name]
Proposed by: [username] Date: [YYYY-MM-DD] Status: Proposed
What is changing?
Select the type of change:
- Weight adjustment
- Scope change — e.g. adding or removing specific repos, signals, or endpoints
- Full retirement — remove this site entirely
- Other modification
Current state:
[Describe what the site/repo currently looks like in config.yaml and docs/sites/active/.]
Proposed state: [Describe exactly what you want it to look like after the change. If retiring, state that.]
Why is this change being proposed?
[What has changed — in the community, the platform, or the signal quality — that makes this change appropriate now? For retirements, select the primary reason:]
- Platform became inaccessible or paywalled (violates ADR 003)
- Data quality degraded — signal no longer meaningful
- Gaming or manipulation detected
- Community migrated away — platform no longer actively used
- Platform shut down or became unstable
- Community voted to remove
- Other
Evidence
[Data, observations, or discussion that supports the change. For a weight increase, show increased activity or centrality. For a weight reduction or retirement, show reduced relevance, activity, or a specific incident.]
Impact
[Who or what is affected by this change? Does it reduce anyone's score meaningfully? Is that the intended outcome, or a side effect?]
If retiring: what happens to historical data?
[Describe what was done with any participation data already collected from this site. Was it zeroed out? Kept for historical comparison? Archived separately?]
Should this site ever be reconsidered? [Note any conditions under which this decision should be revisited — e.g. "reconsider if the platform restores public access" or "permanent — gaming risk too high."]
Was there disagreement?
[Note any dissenting views and how they were addressed. If the vote was close, record the margin — future contributors deserve to know if this was contested.]
Discussion
[Link to forum thread or other discussion, once opened.]